TL;DR: Quick Takeaways
- •NIST CSF is a voluntary framework created by the National Institute of Standards and Technology to help organizations manage cybersecurity risks
- •Built on 5 core functions: Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover (now 6 with Govern in CSF 2.0)
- •NIST CSF 2.0 was released in February 2024 with enhanced governance, supply chain risk management, and organizational context
- •Framework is technology-neutral and works across all industries (originally created for critical infrastructure)
- •Used by 50%+ of organizations globally for cybersecurity risk management and compliance alignment
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is the world's most widely adopted voluntary framework for managing and reducing cybersecurity risk. Created by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) in 2014 and updated to version 2.0 in 2024, it provides a common language and structured approach for organizations to assess and improve their cybersecurity posture.
Originally developed for critical infrastructure sectors (energy, healthcare, finance, transportation), the framework has been adopted by organizations of all sizes and industries worldwide. Unlike prescriptive compliance standards (SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA), NIST CSF is flexible and outcome-focused, allowing organizations to prioritize cybersecurity activities based on business needs, risk tolerance, and resource constraints.
This comprehensive guide explains what NIST CSF is, the 5 core functions (now 6 in CSF 2.0), how to implement the framework, and how it compares to other cybersecurity standards like ISO 27001 and SOC 2.
📋 What is NIST CSF?
The NIST Cybersecurity Framework (CSF) is a set of guidelines, best practices, and standards for managing cybersecurity risk. It was created through collaboration between government and the private sector following Executive Order 13636 in 2013, which mandated the development of a voluntary framework to reduce cyber risks to critical infrastructure.
Key Characteristics
✓ Voluntary & Flexible
Not a regulation or certification – organizations adopt it voluntarily and customize based on their risk profile and business needs.
✓ Technology-Neutral
Framework applies to any industry, technology stack, or organization size. Not tied to specific tools or vendors.
✓ Risk-Based Approach
Focuses on understanding and prioritizing risks rather than prescribing specific controls. Organizations implement what makes sense for their context.
✓ Compatible with Other Standards
Maps to ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, and other frameworks. Can be used to harmonize multiple compliance requirements.
💡 Who Should Use NIST CSF?
The framework is designed for organizations of all sizes and sectors:
- →Critical Infrastructure: Energy, healthcare, finance, transportation, communications
- →Federal Agencies: NIST CSF increasingly used alongside NIST 800-53 and FedRAMP
- →Private Sector: Technology, manufacturing, retail, professional services
- →Small & Medium Businesses: Simplified profiles available for resource-constrained organizations
🎯 The 5 Core Functions (+ Govern in CSF 2.0)
The NIST CSF is organized around 5 core functions (now 6 in CSF 2.0) that represent the high-level cybersecurity lifecycle. Each function contains categories and subcategories that provide more specific outcomes and activities.
Govern (New in CSF 2.0)
What it means: Establish and monitor the organization's cybersecurity risk management strategy, expectations, and policy. This function was added in CSF 2.0 to emphasize governance as foundational.
Key Activities:
- • Cybersecurity governance structure and accountability
- • Risk management strategy and risk tolerance
- • Cybersecurity supply chain risk management (C-SCRM)
- • Roles, responsibilities, and authorities
- • Policy, legal, and regulatory compliance
- • Workforce diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility
Identify
What it means: Develop an understanding of your organization's cybersecurity risks to systems, people, assets, data, and capabilities.
Key Activities:
- • Asset management (hardware, software, data, personnel)
- • Business environment and critical services
- • Governance policies and legal requirements
- • Risk assessment and threat intelligence
- • Supply chain risk identification
Protect
What it means: Implement safeguards to ensure delivery of critical infrastructure services and limit or contain the impact of cybersecurity events.
Key Activities:
- • Identity management and access control (IAM, MFA, RBAC)
- • Awareness and training programs
- • Data security (encryption, DLP, backups)
- • Information protection processes and procedures
- • Protective technology (firewalls, antivirus, endpoint protection)
- • Maintenance and patching
Detect
What it means: Develop and implement activities to identify the occurrence of a cybersecurity event in a timely manner.
Key Activities:
- • Anomalies and events detection (SIEM, IDS/IPS)
- • Security continuous monitoring
- • Detection processes and procedures
- • Threat intelligence and vulnerability scanning
- • Logging and alerting mechanisms
Respond
What it means: Take action regarding a detected cybersecurity incident to contain its impact and restore normal operations.
Key Activities:
- • Response planning and incident response procedures
- • Communications (internal and external)
- • Analysis and forensics
- • Mitigation and containment
- • Improvements based on lessons learned
Recover
What it means: Develop and implement activities to maintain resilience and restore capabilities or services impaired by a cybersecurity incident.
Key Activities:
- • Recovery planning and disaster recovery
- • Improvements to recovery processes
- • Communications during recovery
- • Business continuity and restoration priorities
- • Post-incident review and lessons learned
🚀 NIST CSF 2.0: What's New in 2024-2025?
In February 2024, NIST released CSF 2.0, the first major update since the framework's 2014 launch. The update reflects a decade of lessons learned and addresses modern cybersecurity challenges like supply chain risk, ransomware, and governance.
New in CSF 2.0
- +Govern Function: New 6th function emphasizing governance, risk strategy, and organizational context as foundational to cybersecurity.
- +Supply Chain Risk Management: Enhanced guidance on cybersecurity supply chain risk management (C-SCRM) across all functions.
- +Expanded Scope: Framework now explicitly applies to all organizations, not just critical infrastructure.
- +Organizational Profiles: Renamed from "Framework Profiles" to emphasize broader organizational context beyond cybersecurity.
Enhanced Guidance
- →Ransomware & Extortion: Specific subcategories addressing ransomware response and recovery.
- →Diversity & Inclusion: Added subcategories on workforce diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility (DEIA).
- →Measurement & Metrics: Better guidance on measuring cybersecurity program effectiveness and progress.
- →Reference Updates: Refreshed mappings to NIST 800-53r5, ISO 27001:2022, and CIS Controls v8.
Migration Note: Organizations using CSF 1.1 can migrate to CSF 2.0 gradually. The core structure remains similar, with new Govern function complementing (not replacing) existing practices.
📊 NIST CSF Implementation Tiers (1-4)
NIST CSF defines 4 Implementation Tiers that describe the degree to which an organization's cybersecurity risk management practices exhibit the characteristics defined in the Framework. Tiers help organizations understand their current state and target state.
Tier 1: Partial
Characteristics: Cybersecurity risk management is ad hoc, reactive, and not formalized. Limited awareness of cybersecurity risk at organizational level.
- • No formal risk management process
- • Limited or no cybersecurity budget
- • Reactive approach to incidents
- • Siloed security activities
Tier 2: Risk Informed
Characteristics: Risk management practices are approved by management but may not be established as organizational-wide policy. Awareness of risk exists but inconsistently implemented.
- • Some risk management processes defined
- • Inconsistent implementation across organization
- • Limited collaboration between departments
- • Awareness of supply chain risks but limited management
Tier 3: Repeatable
Characteristics: Risk management practices are formally approved and expressed as policy. Consistent methods are in place and regularly updated based on changing risks and lessons learned.
- • Organization-wide cybersecurity policy and procedures
- • Consistent risk-based approach across departments
- • Regular training and awareness programs
- • Collaboration with supply chain partners on cyber risk
Tier 4: Adaptive
Characteristics: Adaptive organization with advanced, real-time cybersecurity risk management that incorporates lessons learned and predictive indicators. Organization actively shares information with partners.
- • Continuous improvement and adaptation to threats
- • Real-time visibility and risk-based decision making
- • Integrated threat intelligence and advanced analytics
- • Active participation in cyber threat information sharing communities
💡 Choosing Your Target Tier
Organizations should select a target tier based on their risk tolerance, threat environment, legal requirements, business objectives, and resource constraints. Most organizations aim for Tier 2 (minimum viable) to Tier 3 (mature) depending on industry and risk exposure. Tier 4 is typically reserved for critical infrastructure or highly regulated industries.
📝 Framework Profiles: Current & Target States
A Framework Profile (renamed "Organizational Profile" in CSF 2.0) represents an organization's alignment with the NIST CSF Core based on business needs, risk tolerance, and resources. Profiles help organizations:
- ✓Establish a Current Profile (where you are today)
- ✓Define a Target Profile (where you want to be)
- ✓Identify gaps between current and target states
- ✓Prioritize actions to close gaps based on risk and business needs
- ✓Communicate cybersecurity posture to stakeholders
Current Profile
Documents the outcomes from the Framework Core that are currently being achieved. Created through:
- 1.Self-assessment against CSF categories/subcategories
- 2.Review of existing policies, procedures, and controls
- 3.Interviews with stakeholders across organization
- 4.Assessment of Implementation Tier (1-4)
Target Profile
Describes desired cybersecurity outcomes based on business drivers and risk tolerance. Created through:
- 1.Analysis of regulatory and contractual requirements
- 2.Industry benchmarks and best practices
- 3.Business objectives and risk appetite
- 4.Resource constraints and timeline
Map NIST CSF to ISO 27001, SOC 2 & More
LowerPlane automatically maps NIST CSF controls to ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, and PCI-DSS. Implement once, satisfy multiple frameworks with 70%+ control overlap.
🎯 Who Should Use NIST CSF?
Best Fit For
- ✓Critical Infrastructure: Energy, healthcare, finance, water, transportation, communications sectors (original audience).
- ✓Federal Contractors: Organizations working with government agencies increasingly asked to demonstrate NIST CSF alignment.
- ✓Multi-Framework Organizations: Companies pursuing SOC 2, ISO 27001, HIPAA, PCI-DSS can use NIST CSF as unifying framework.
- ✓Risk-Based Approach Seekers: Organizations wanting flexibility to prioritize based on their unique risk profile rather than prescriptive controls.
Industry Examples
Healthcare
Map NIST CSF to HIPAA Security Rule. Use CSF as overarching framework for enterprise risk management.
Financial Services
Align with regulatory requirements (GLBA, FFIEC, FINRA) while demonstrating NIST CSF maturity to auditors.
Technology/SaaS
Use NIST CSF internally for risk management while pursuing SOC 2 Type II for customer trust.
Manufacturing
Address OT/ICS cybersecurity alongside IT systems. Align with CMMC 2.0 for DoD contracts.
Note: NIST CSF is voluntary (not mandatory) for most private sector organizations. However, some regulations (e.g., NY DFS Cybersecurity Regulation) and contracts reference NIST CSF as acceptable framework for compliance.
⚖️ NIST CSF vs ISO 27001 vs SOC 2
NIST CSF is often compared to ISO 27001 and SOC 2, but it serves a different purpose. Here's how they compare:
| Aspect | NIST CSF | ISO 27001 | SOC 2 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Type | Risk framework | Certification standard | Attestation report |
| Purpose | Internal risk management | External certification | Customer assurance |
| Mandatory? | No (voluntary) | No (voluntary certification) | No (customer-driven) |
| Audit Required? | No (self-assessment) | Yes (certification audit) | Yes (Type I or II) |
| Structure | 6 functions (CSF 2.0), 23 categories, 108 subcategories | 93 controls (Annex A), ISMS requirements | 5 Trust Service Criteria, 64+ controls |
| Cost | $0 (framework is free) | $15K-$50K (certification) | $15K-$100K+ (Type II) |
| Best For | Internal governance & risk management | Global certification & GDPR alignment | US SaaS customer requirements |
| Recognition | Global (especially US government) | Global (especially EU/APAC) | North America (growing globally) |
💡 Using NIST CSF Alongside Other Frameworks
Many organizations use NIST CSF as an internal risk management framework while pursuing ISO 27001 or SOC 2 for external certification. The frameworks have 60-75% control overlap, so implementing one supports the others.
Example: A SaaS company might use NIST CSF for enterprise risk management, pursue SOC 2 Type II for US customers, and map to ISO 27001 for European prospects. LowerPlane automates these mappings to reduce duplicate work.
✅ Benefits of Adopting NIST CSF
For Organizations
- ✓Common Language: Provides consistent terminology for discussing cybersecurity risk across technical and business teams.
- ✓Flexible & Scalable: Adapts to organizations of any size, industry, or maturity level.
- ✓Risk Prioritization: Helps prioritize security investments based on business impact and risk tolerance.
- ✓Multi-Framework Alignment: Maps to ISO 27001, SOC 2, HIPAA, PCI-DSS, CIS Controls, NIST 800-53, and more.
- ✓Continuous Improvement: Supports iterative approach to cybersecurity maturity.
For Business Outcomes
- ✓Customer Trust: Demonstrates commitment to cybersecurity best practices.
- ✓Regulatory Alignment: Supports compliance with various industry regulations (HIPAA, GLBA, FFIEC).
- ✓Supply Chain Risk: Facilitates communication about cybersecurity expectations with vendors and partners.
- ✓Insurance & Cyber Risk: May qualify for better cyber insurance rates with documented CSF implementation.
- ✓Board Communication: Provides structure for reporting cybersecurity posture to executives and board.
🚀 Getting Started with NIST CSF: 7-Step Implementation
Set Scope & Objectives
Define what systems, assets, and processes will be covered. Identify business objectives, regulatory requirements, and risk tolerance. Secure executive buy-in and allocate resources.
Create Current Profile
Assess your current cybersecurity posture against NIST CSF categories and subcategories. Document existing controls, policies, and procedures. Determine current Implementation Tier (1-4).
Conduct Risk Assessment
Identify assets, threats, vulnerabilities, and potential business impacts. Prioritize risks based on likelihood and impact. Document risk register with treatment plans.
Define Target Profile
Based on business requirements, regulatory obligations, and risk assessment, define desired cybersecurity outcomes. Select target Implementation Tier and prioritize categories/subcategories.
Perform Gap Analysis
Compare Current Profile to Target Profile to identify gaps. Prioritize gaps based on risk, cost, and business impact. Create remediation roadmap with timelines and ownership.
Implement Action Plan
Execute remediation activities to close gaps. Implement new controls, update policies, conduct training, deploy security tools. Track progress against roadmap and adjust as needed.
Monitor & Improve
Continuously monitor cybersecurity posture through metrics and KPIs. Conduct periodic reassessments (annually or when significant changes occur). Update profiles based on new threats, business changes, and lessons learned.
Timeline: Initial NIST CSF implementation typically takes 3-6 months for assessment and planning, plus 6-12 months for remediation and maturation. Organizations can adopt iteratively, starting with high-priority areas.
📚 Related Resources
NIST CSF vs ISO 27001
Compare NIST CSF and ISO 27001 to understand when to use each framework
Read More →ISO 27001 Certification
Learn about ISO 27001 certification and how it complements NIST CSF
Learn More →Book a Demo
See how LowerPlane maps NIST CSF to multiple compliance frameworks
Schedule Demo →❓ Frequently Asked Questions
Is NIST CSF mandatory for my organization?
No, NIST CSF is a voluntary framework for most organizations. However, some regulations (e.g., NY DFS Cybersecurity Regulation) allow or encourage NIST CSF as an acceptable approach. Federal contractors may also be asked to demonstrate NIST CSF alignment in RFPs.
Can I get certified in NIST CSF?
There is no official NIST CSF certification like ISO 27001. However, some third-party organizations offer NIST CSF assessments and attestations. Most organizations self-assess against the framework and use it for internal risk management rather than external certification.
What's the difference between NIST CSF and NIST 800-53?
NIST CSF is a high-level risk management framework with 6 functions and 108 subcategories, designed for all organizations. NIST 800-53 is a detailed security control catalog with 1,000+ controls, primarily used by federal agencies and contractors for FedRAMP, FISMA, and CMMC compliance. CSF maps to 800-53 for implementation.
Should I adopt NIST CSF 2.0 or stay with CSF 1.1?
NIST recommends transitioning to CSF 2.0 as it reflects current threat landscape and incorporates lessons learned since 2014. The new Govern function and enhanced supply chain guidance are valuable additions. Organizations can migrate gradually – the core structure is similar, with the Govern function complementing (not replacing) existing practices.
How long does NIST CSF implementation take?
Initial assessment and planning typically takes 2-4 months. Remediation to reach target maturity can take 6-12 months or longer depending on current state and target tier. Organizations can implement iteratively, starting with high-priority areas and expanding over time. Continuous monitoring and improvement is ongoing.
Does NIST CSF help with SOC 2 or ISO 27001 compliance?
Yes! NIST CSF has 60-75% overlap with ISO 27001 and SOC 2. Many organizations use NIST CSF as their internal risk management framework while pursuing SOC 2 or ISO 27001 for external certification. LowerPlane automatically maps NIST CSF controls to these frameworks to reduce duplicate work.
Get Cybersecurity Framework Guides & Best Practices
Join 5,000+ security professionals getting expert insights on NIST CSF, ISO 27001, SOC 2, and multi-framework strategies.
No spam. Unsubscribe anytime.